next up previous contents
Next: Rotations of a circle Up: Dynamical Systems and Fractal Previous: Metric spaces

Dynamical systems, orbits and attractors

 

A dynamical system is a mapping of a metric space into itself. To lend some control to the ``generations,'' we require that our mapping be continuous. Continuity may be defined entirely in terms of limits. Suppose tex2html_wrap_inline7072 is a sequence of points in X that has a limit tex2html_wrap_inline7076 . In any such situation, we insist that

displaymath7120

If this is always the case, we declare F to be continuous.

L-systems have such a continuous mapping associated to them. For example, in the case of the Fibonacci L-system, we define

displaymath7128

and for any trajectory tex2html_wrap_inline7130 we define tex2html_wrap_inline7132 . We leave it as an exercise to prove that F is actually continuous.

The continuous mapping tex2html_wrap_inline7136 produces the generations by iteration. Starting with the initial generation or state tex2html_wrap_inline7138 , we define tex2html_wrap_inline7140 , tex2html_wrap_inline7142 , etc. Briefly, we write tex2html_wrap_inline7144 , and we call the function tex2html_wrap_inline7146 obtained by composing F with itself n times the n-th iterate of F. The sequence tex2html_wrap_inline7156 is called the orbit of tex2html_wrap_inline4950 under F.

For the Fibonacci L-system, we have seen that

displaymath7164

the Fibonacci sequence of a's and b's. It can be shown that this limit is true no matter what the initial generation tex2html_wrap_inline5130 is chosen to be in code-space. The limit sequence tex2html_wrap_inline5358 satisfies tex2html_wrap_inline7174 ; we say tex2html_wrap_inline5358 is a fixed point of F. In fact, tex2html_wrap_inline5358 is the only fixed point of F. tex2html_wrap_inline5358 is an example of an attractor of a dynamical system. Attractors may be much more complicated than a single point; all the fractals we shall consider are attractors of some relatively simple dynamical systems, and this is a large part of their interest.

Attractors arise as the limiting behavior of orbits. Sequences tex2html_wrap_inline7186 can have tremendously variable behavior.

This leads to the following notions.
subsequence:
A subsequence of a sequence tex2html_wrap_inline7202 is a selection tex2html_wrap_inline7204 where tex2html_wrap_inline7206 . For instance, we could select tex2html_wrap_inline7208 , tex2html_wrap_inline7210 , tex2html_wrap_inline7212 , etc., and obtain the subsequence of even-indexed terms. There are infinitely many choices of possible subsequences.gif
point of accumulation:
A point of accumulation, also called a limit point, of a sequence tex2html_wrap_inline7214 is a point tex2html_wrap_inline7076 that occurs as the limit of some subsequence tex2html_wrap_inline7218 . That is,

displaymath7220

Take special note of the use of ``a'' instead of ``the.'' A sequence can have lots of points of accumulation.

limit set:
The limit set of a sequence is the set of points of accumulation of the sequence.
attractor:
An attractor of a dynamical system is the limit set of some orbit tex2html_wrap_inline7222 . Different orbits may have different attractors. It's a particularly nice situation (and not uncommon) when the attractor is the same for all orbits. That's the case for the Fibonacci L-system.

When does a sequence have a point of accumulation? That depends on possible ``holes'' in our metric space. One common assumption is that the metric space has no ``holes,'' other than tex2html_wrap_inline7006 possibly. That leads to two more popular pieces of terminology

complete:
A metric space is complete if every bounded sequence has at least one point of accumulation.
compact:
A metric space is compact if every sequence (bounded or otherwise) has at least one point of accumulation.

The same terms may be applied to subsets of a metric space that meet the criteria. Euclidean space tex2html_wrap_inline6188 is known to be complete (but not compact); code-space is actually compact.


next up previous contents
Next: Rotations of a circle Up: Dynamical Systems and Fractal Previous: Metric spaces

David J. Wright
Mon Aug 19 17:21:15 CDT 1996